Tuesday, February 10, 2009

"M'aidez" call - already answered? A correction




One of Knutsford Royal Mayday's most respected and long-standing organisers has pointed out to me an inaccuracy in the following item I posted back in March 2008, and for which I must put the record straight ...

Knutsford "Royal" Mayday under threat? Whatever next?


In it, referring to letters appearing in the local newspaper around that time, I wrote this:
    "But the event itself does not raise money for its own survival. On the other hand, it is very expensive to put on. Much of this cost goes into policing, especially owing to the fact that routes through the town have to be temporarily closed.

    The thought of Knutsford without its Mayday is a bit like the thought of Cheshire without Jodrell Bank (don't forget to sign the petition, by the way).

    I read a good suggestion today that those taking part could be asked to pay a small fee - say £2. This seems to me to be a reasonable and modest amount, yet it could really make a big difference. Actually, I think it should be made optional, and the amount left to people's discretion: if we value the tradition that much then we will be willing to pay for it. Knutsford is famous for being pretty well-heeled, after all. On the other hand (and perhaps not so well-recognised by the outside world) it is also home to many much less well-off families for whom it would be totally wrong to impose any financial hurdle to their participation.

    Surely, those of us who can afford it would be prepared to dig into our pockets to save this gem of ours?"
I'm most grateful to my contact for letting me know that there is in fact a voluntary donation scheme for families taking part in the event: indeed it was devised by her, and already existed at the time I wrote the article. Moreover, she assures me that it has been very successful in raising additional funds each year. This is excellent news. In absolute terms I daresay it is still a drop in the ocean, and cannot hope by itself to guarantee the long-term future of the Mayday. But at the very least it does one exceedingly valuable thing: it demonstrates the considerable affection and high regard in which this unique festival is held by our townsfolk.

Long may it continue.

I do apologise for having got it wrong last March.

Mike

No comments: